Your AI Financial Copilot for Benchmark Driven Growth
Matchita turns your budget into a growth engine by analyzing your financials, benchmarking them against an anonymized panel of scaled peers, and helping you confidently plan your next stage of growth.
No integrations needed. No document storage. Private by design.
Reports
Matchita’s benchmarking platform generates smart, actionable reports to guide strategic growth.
These include KPI Benchmark Reports to compare performance with peers, Growth & Efficiency Scorecards to assess traction and spending, VC-Ready PDFs for fundraising, Compensation Benchmarks for hiring decisions, and Historical KPI Trends to track progress over time. Each report is tailored to your stage, industry, and geography — helping you identify gaps, improve faster, and share insights with investors or acquirers.
Step 1: Build Your P&L
Connect your expense/revenue tools or use a Google Sheets template—Matchita assembles your P&L and baseline KPIs.
Step 2: Benchmark & Diagnose
Auto-generate a complete KPI set and benchmark it against an anonymized panel of scaled peers who grew up faster from similar stage to surface performance gaps, key insights, challenges, and trends—delivered in a CEO-ready report.
Step 3: Plan for Growth & Act
Set plain-language targets, align with relevant peer KPI benchmarks, and let Matchita simulate an updated P&L and scenarios. Review proposed assumptions and receive an actionable plan—pricing strategies, hiring plans, GTM adjustments—plus refreshed CEO reports..
See recent KPI queries and their benchmarking answers.
Benchmark my CAC playbook against similar peers
Your CAC payback period is 14 months — 60% longer than your peers’, who have optimized paid channels and increased deal size.
Benchmark the compensation package for hiring my VP of Sales in California
Base Salary: $130k - $160k.
On-Target Earnings (OTE): $200k-$250k.
Equity Range: 0.3%-1.0%.
Commission on Quota: 10%-15%.
Your VP of Sales is 20% below the benchmark OTE.
Your peers’ compensation packages help retain top leadership
Benchmark my burn rate vs. growth against similar peers
High burn: $180K/month with just 3% MoM growth vs. 12% peer median. Peers spent less on headcount, with higher conversions.
Benchmark my LTV:CAC ratio over the past three years
Data Gaps Detected. Missing benchmarking data on "LTV:CAC ratio." Provide access to customer lifetime and CAC data to complete the analysis.
Benchmark my gross margin against similar peers
Your gross margin is 48%, compared to a 63% median among peers, who improved profitability by optimizing pricing and vendor costs.
Benchmark my sales cycle length against similar peers
Your sales cycle is 55 days, compared to a 90-day median among comparable peers. Larger peers have shortened it further by refining their ICP or simplifying onboarding
Benchmark my R&D-to-Collections ratio
You spend 6% on R&D, while peers at a similar stage spend 18%, primarily to accelerate product innovation.
What did companies like mine give for holidays?
You spent $25 per employee, while your peer panel’s median spend was $98 per employee.
How does my startup’s burn multiple compare to high-performing peers?
Your startup’s burn multiple is 2.8 (Net Cash Burn / Net New ARR ), compared to a peer median of 1.6.
Peers with lower burn multiples maintain a leaner cost structure and focus their spending on high-conversion channels.
Benchmark Ranges (SaaS context):
Burn Multiple | Efficiency | Finance View |
< 1.0x | Exceptional | High ROI on spend |
1.0x–1.5x | Strong | Efficient growth |
1.5x–2.5x | Mixed | May need optimization |
> 2.5x | Poor | Unsustainable without major growth |