Your AI Financial Copilot for Benchmark Driven Growth
Matchita turns your budget into a growth engine by analyzing your financials, benchmarking them against an anonymized panel of scaled peers, and helping you confidently plan your next stage of growth.
No integrations needed. No document storage. Private by design.
Why Founders, CFOs, CEOs, and Investors Use Matchita
Every company makes mistakes even profitable companies fall asleep at a wheel — but most don’t realize it until it’s too late.
What if you're overpaying for customer acquisition? Or burning cash while believing you're scaling?
Without real benchmarks, you’re operating in a vacuum.
Matchita compares your numbers to anonymized panels of similar, successful companies — by stage, industry, and geography — so you know exactly where you stand.
Why Matchita Beats Manual Benchmarking Consultants
Matchita benchmarks 100% of your KPIs instantly, flags missing metrics, and compares you to an anonymized panel of peers — all securely and privately.
Manual benchmarking consultants focus on a few KPIs, rely on interviews, and deliver static reports after weeks of work — costing thousands for outdated insights.
Why Most Founders Don’t Know Their Full KPI Picture
Most early-stage founders don’t know their full KPI picture — and it’s not their fault. Financial data is scattered across multiple tools, they lack a dedicated FP&A team or CFO, and they don’t know what “good” looks like for their stage. Without benchmarks, they rely on gut instinct and often spot mistakes only when it’s too late — like during a fundraise or after a churn spike. As a result, they risk making costly decisions based on flawed assumptions.
Why Your Metrics May Be Misleading
When you base decisions solely on your own historical data, errors compound.
Matchita breaks that cycle by showing you how your numbers stack up against companies that have already solved what you're struggling with.
Spot wrong assumptions.
Detect gaps in your KPI set.
Avoid costly misallocations.
Reports
Matchita’s benchmarking platform generates smart, actionable reports to guide strategic growth.
These include KPI Benchmark Reports to compare performance with peers, Growth & Efficiency Scorecards to assess traction and spending, VC-Ready PDFs for fundraising, Compensation Benchmarks for hiring decisions, and Historical KPI Trends to track progress over time. Each report is tailored to your stage, industry, and geography — helping you identify gaps, improve faster, and share insights with investors or acquirers.
Step 1: Discover Your KPI Set
We analyze your financials to automatically generate a tailored KPI set — including metrics you may be missing. No integrations required. Just upload and uncover what really matters.
Step 2: Benchmark Your KPIs Confidentially
Get a private, investor-ready dashboard that benchmarks your KPIs against anonymized, comparable companies. Spot where you're ahead or falling behind — and tell a clear story to boards and VCs.
Step 3: Model Your Growth with Real Benchmarks
Simulate strategic decisions using real peer benchmarks. Model scenarios like team expansion or pricing changes, and see how they’ll impact growth, burn, and efficiency — all in context, before you implement your plan.
See recent KPI queries and their benchmarking answers.
Benchmark my CAC playbook against similar peers
Your CAC payback period is 14 months — 60% longer than your peers’, who have optimized paid channels and increased deal size.
Benchmark the compensation package for hiring my VP of Sales in California
Base Salary: $130k - $160k.
On-Target Earnings (OTE): $200k-$250k.
Equity Range: 0.3%-1.0%.
Commission on Quota: 10%-15%.
Your VP of Sales is 20% below the benchmark OTE.
Your peers’ compensation packages help retain top leadership
Benchmark my burn rate vs. growth against similar peers
High burn: $180K/month with just 3% MoM growth vs. 12% peer median. Peers spent less on headcount, with higher conversions.
Benchmark my LTV:CAC ratio over the past three years
Data Gaps Detected. Missing benchmarking data on "LTV:CAC ratio." Provide access to customer lifetime and CAC data to complete the analysis.
Benchmark my gross margin against similar peers
Your gross margin is 48%, compared to a 63% median among peers, who improved profitability by optimizing pricing and vendor costs.
Benchmark my sales cycle length against similar peers
Your sales cycle is 55 days, compared to a 90-day median among comparable peers. Larger peers have shortened it further by refining their ICP or simplifying onboarding
Benchmark my R&D-to-Collections ratio
You spend 6% on R&D, while peers at a similar stage spend 18%, primarily to accelerate product innovation.
What did companies like mine give for holidays?
You spent $25 per employee, while your peer panel’s median spend was $98 per employee.
How does my startup’s burn multiple compare to high-performing peers?
Your startup’s burn multiple is 2.8 (Net Cash Burn / Net New ARR ), compared to a peer median of 1.6.
Peers with lower burn multiples maintain a leaner cost structure and focus their spending on high-conversion channels.
Benchmark Ranges (SaaS context):
Burn Multiple | Efficiency | Finance View |
< 1.0x | Exceptional | High ROI on spend |
1.0x–1.5x | Strong | Efficient growth |
1.5x–2.5x | Mixed | May need optimization |
> 2.5x | Poor | Unsustainable without major growth |